Summary of the system strength RIT-T process

Transgrid has developed a portfolio of system strength solutions to meet its regulatory obligations and to maximise net market benefits. The net benefits delivered by the project are assessed via the Regulatory Investment Test for Transmission (RIT-T) administered by the Australian Energy Regulator (AER).

The RIT-T is a formal consultation process designed to:

  • inform stakeholders of the investment need and proposed options to address it
  • test the market for alternative and more efficient solutions
  • explain to stakeholders the basis on which the preferred option has been selected.

The RIT-T consultation process involves the publication of three reports, which are available below along with an additional Consultation Report:

As the first step in the RIT-T process, The PSCR details the need to meet system strength requirements in NSW and describes credible options to meet the need, including technical characteristics required of a non-network option.

The PADR provides a detailed assessment of credible options to maintain system strength in NSW, including quantified market benefits and costs, and gives stakeholders the opportunity to review and comment on the analysis before a final preferred option is identified. Submissions received in response to the PSCR were considered when preparing the PADR. 

This report assessed the potential impacts of developments on the preferred option identified in the PADR and allowed the industry to consult on these developments ahead of the development of the final stage of the RIT-T, the PACR.

As the final step in the RIT-T process, the PACR responds to all submissions made for the PADR and PADR Supplementary Report and identifies the overall preferred portfolio option to meet the identified need.

Following the publication of the PACR, the AER received a notice of dispute from the Centre for Independent Studies (CIS) disputing its conclusions. After considering the grounds for the dispute raised by the CIS, the AER determined that, based on the grounds of the dispute, Transgrid will not be required to amend the PACR. Details of the dispute can be found here.

Further details on each stage of the RIT-T are provided further below.

Assessing material changes in circumstances (MCC)

Since publication of the PACR, Transgrid continued to monitor changes in the energy market to ensure that the portfolio of system strength solutions remains robust. In April 2026, Transgrid notified the AER of a Material Change in Circumstance and in June 2026, the AER published its determination, requiring Transgrid to complete a streamlined assessment and publish a draft and final report outlining any changes to the PACR preferred portfolio. 

This report describes Transgrid's reassessment and identified changes to the preferred portfolio of system strength solutions, incorporating updated information since the PACR publication. 

This report incorporates and addresses stakeholder submissions received from four parties over a one-month consultation period following publication of the Draft MCC Report.

Further details on each stage of the RIT-T and MCC, including workbooks and proponent submissions, are provided further below.

Regulatory documents

Project Specification Consultation Report (PSCR)

Document

PDF 1.35 MB

Project Assessment Draft Report (PADR)

Document

PDF 3.45 MB

Document

PDF 3.15 MB

Document

XLSB 815.40 KB

Document

XLSB 785.26 KB

Document

PDF 1.08 MB

Document

PDF 2.66 MB

PADR Supplementary Report

Document

PDF 962.89 KB

Project Assessment Conclusions Report (PACR)

Document

PDF 3.31 MB

Document

PDF 2.67 MB

Document

XLSB 931.82 KB

Document

PDF 3.64 MB

Draft MCC Assessment

Document

PDF 1.59 MB

Document

XLSX 912.74 KB

Document

XLSX 875.79 KB

Final MCC Assessment

Document

PDF 1.97 MB

Document

XLSX 912.29 KB

Document

XLSX 868.84 KB

Stakeholder submissions

Transgrid has engaged in a consultation process following publication of the PSCR, PADR and PADR Supplementary Report to provide industry and stakeholders with the opportunity to provide feedback on the credible options presented, issues addressed, proposed methodology and preferred option outcomes.

PSCR submissions

In response to the PSCR, we received submissions from two parties throughout the six-week consultation period

Document

PDF 214.42 KB

Document

PDF 112.20 KB

Document

PDF 151.27 KB

Document

PDF 1.76 MB

PADR submissions

In response to the PADR, we received submissions from five parties throughout the twelve-week consultation period, one of which is confidential.

Document

PDF 303.10 KB

Document

PDF 651.74 KB

PADR supplementary report submissions

In response to the Supplementary Report to the PADR, we received submissions from one party throughout the four-week consultation period

Document

PDF 210.73 KB

Draft MCC Assessment submissions

Document

PDF 236.79 KB

Document

PDF 112.57 KB

Document

PDF 139.83 KB

Document

PDF 119.52 KB